An Overview of Java Garbage Collectors

Transcript

Hi friends! Today, we are talking about Garbage Collectors in Java.

Choosing a right GC implementation may help you boost the app performance. HotSpot JVM offers seven collectors for various performance requirements. So, let’s look at all of them!

A couple of words about Java Memory Model

Young generation, old generation

Serial GC 

Serial GC is the simplest and the oldest collector in Java. It works in one thread and freezes all app threads while performing collection. It is good for single-threaded client-side applications that don’t need extra small pauses. But there’s a catch: if you limit your application to 2 GB RAM and less than 2 processors, SerialGC will be used automatically, even if you explicitly specify another collector! So be careful with that.


Parallel GC

Parallel GC is also called a throughput collector. It freezes all application threads, but works in multiple threads during the collection. By default, it works in multiple threads when it collects the young generation and the old generation. You can set the number of worker threads, pause time, and the time application spends on the collection.

Concurrent Mark Sweep GC

Concurrent Mark Sweep GC is designed for shorter pauses and uses multiple threads to perform the collection. But it is suitable for applications that can afford to share processor resources with the collector while the application is running. This collector was deprecated in Java 9 and removed in Java 14. 

G1 GC

G1 GC was designed to replace CMS GC. It is now a default garbage collector in Java. G1 GC tries to provide good balance between latency and throughput and is a very good fit for applications running in multiprocessor environments with a large heap of 10 gigabytes and more.

G1 means Garbage First. Just like other collectors, it works with young and old generations, but it splits the heap into multiple equal-sized regions. First, it performs global marking concurrently with the application and determines which objects are reachable. Then, it reclaims space in regions that are mostly filled with garbage, and so frees more memory, this is why it is called garbage first. G1 GC reclaims space using evacuation: it copies and compacts live objects from one or several regions into new regions.

Z GC

Z GC was first introduced in Java 11. It is a scalable low-latency collector, and it is great for latency-sensitive applications and applications with a very large heap of terabytes.

Z GC performs the expensive work concurrently and doesn’t stop the application threads for more than 10 ms. It requires minimal configuration, in most cases, just set the right heap size and you are good to go.

In Java 21, it became generational by default. It means that it maintains separate generations for young and old objects and collects young objects more frequently, which improves heap memory overhead and garbage collection CPU overhead.

Shenandoah GC

Shenandoah GC is also a low-latency collector introduced in Java 12. It performs most of its work concurrently with the app, including the concurrent compaction, so the pause times are not directly proportional to the heap size. Like Z GC, it is suitable for latency-sensitive applications and applications with a very large heap of terabytes. Oracle Java doesn’t ship Shenandoah, but this GC comes with major OpenJDK distributions including Liberica JDK.

Epsilon GC

Epsilon GC is a very interesting garbage collector. It doesn’t perform any garbage collection and only allocates memory. Why would you use a garbage collector that doesn’t collect any garbage? Well, it has a purpose. First, you can use it for performance testing to see how fast the program would run without any garbage collection and if there are performance bottlenecks not induced by the collector.

Also, you can use it with applications that almost don’t produce garbage. Or if the app is short-lived and doesn’t have time to leave garbage. Then the program may run faster without garbage collection cycles.

Another interesting feature of Epsilon GC is that it will remain an experimental feature forever so that you don’t accidentally use it in production. So, to use Epsilon GC, you need to explicitly enable experimental features.

Summary

Java provides multiple garbage collectors (GCs) tailored to different performance needs. Serial GC is ideal for single-threaded apps but pauses all threads, while Parallel GC uses multiple threads to prioritize throughput. G1 GC, the default collector, balances latency and throughput, making it suitable for large heaps, while Z GC and Shenandoah GC cater to low-latency and massive-heap applications by performing most tasks concurrently. Lastly, Epsilon GC skips garbage collection entirely, useful for testing or short-lived apps, but requires explicit enabling as an experimental feature.

About Catherine

Java developer passionate about Spring Boot. Writer. Developer Advocate at BellSoft

Social Media

Videos
card image
Dec 12, 2025
Will AI Replace Developers? A Vibe Coding Reality Check 2025

Can AI replace software engineers? ChatGPT, Copilot, and LLM-powered vibe coding tools promise to automate development—but after testing them against 17 years of production experience, the answer is more nuanced than the hype suggests. Full project generation produces over-engineered code that's hard to refactor. AI assistants excel at boilerplate but fail at business logic. MCP servers solve hallucination problems but create context overload. Meanwhile, DevOps automation actually works. This breakdown separates AI capabilities from marketing promises—essential for teams integrating LLMs and copilots without compromising code quality or architectural decisions.

Videos
card image
Dec 12, 2025
JRush | Container Essentials: Fast Builds, Secure Images, Zero Vulnerabilities

Web-conference for Java developers focused on hands-on strategies for building high-performance containers, eliminating CVEs, and detecting security issues before production.

Further watching

Videos
card image
Dec 30, 2025
Java in 2025: LTS Release, AI on JVM, Framework Modernization

Java in 2025 isn't about headline features, it's about how production systems changed under the hood. While release notes focus on individual JEPs, the real story is how the platform, frameworks, and tooling evolved to improve stability, performance, and long-term maintainability. In this video, we look at Java from a production perspective. What does Java 25 LTS mean for teams planning to upgrade? How are memory efficiency, startup time, and observability getting better? Why do changes like Scoped Values and AOT optimizations matter beyond benchmarks? We also cover the broader ecosystem: Spring Boot 4 and Framework 7, AI on the JVM with Spring AI and LangChain4j, Kotlin's growing role in backend systems, and tooling updates that make upgrades easier. Finally, we touch on container hardening and why runtime and supply-chain decisions matter just as much as language features.

Videos
card image
Dec 24, 2025
I Solved Advent of Code 2025 in Kotlin: Here's How It Went

Every year, Advent of Code spawns thousands of solutions — but few engineers step back to see the bigger picture. This is a complete walkthrough of all 12 days from 2025, focused on engineering patterns rather than puzzle statements. We cover scalable techniques: interval math without brute force, dynamic programming, graph algorithms (JGraphT), geometry with Java AWT Polygon, and optimization problems that need constraint solvers like ojAlgo. You'll see how Java and Kotlin handle real constraints, how visualizations validate assumptions, and when to reach for libraries instead of writing everything from scratch. If you love puzzles, programming—or both—and maybe want to learn how to solve them on the JVM, this is for you.

Videos
card image
Dec 18, 2025
Java 26 Preview: New JEPs and What They Mean for You

Java 26 is the next feature release that brings features for enhanced performance, security, and developer experience. This video discusses the upcoming JDK 26 release, highlighting ten JEPs including JEP 500. JEP 500 focuses on preparing developers for future restrictions on mutating final fields in Java, emphasizing their role in maintaining immutable state. This is crucial for robust programming and understanding the nuances of mutable vs immutable data, especially concerning an immutable class in java. We also touch upon the broader implications for functional programming in Java.